Why American Express has an 8 character password limit
(via iamdanw)
The reasons given don’t sound quite right. If there’s really anything to this, I’d love if an expert in the matter could enlighten me with the details.
It’s a crock.
As I’m sure you know, encrypted characters are all equally easy to decrypt, which is to say virtually impossible. The television/movie trope of decrypting one character at a time is just that, a plot device.
As to the “most commonly used keys” malarkey, longer passwords would make these magical “softwares” less able to identify them, not more (given an even distribution of keys).
I’ll never understand this need to bullshit users in the name of security. Especially when the people most likely to ask this sort of question are also the least likely to buy the bullshit, present case notwithstanding.
-
pobierz liked this
-
scrabble--help liked this
-
argent-facile liked this
-
allfreeads liked this
-
israelvacances liked this
-
kennethlove reblogged this from enlavin and added:
So that’s where I’ve been going wrong! I haven’t been using enough alphabets in my passwords. enlavin:
-
romeojulietsierra liked this
-
supafamous reblogged this from ataferner
-
ryanthejenks reblogged this from ataferner and added:
Are you kidding me? Where did...guy learn about online security?!
-
2arrs2ells liked this
-
edf liked this
-
webmarc reblogged this from marco and added:
While few things in life are ever complete, this does fall into the category of complete BS. Taken
-
ataferner liked this
-
chrismear liked this
-
cowsandmilk reblogged this from marco and added:
I’ll skip out on commenting on the American Express response, but the idea that you can’t have an 8 character...
-
herrstucki liked this
-
christopherattle reblogged this from lkm and added:
This guy needs two things, fast, in whichever order is easiest: sodium pentathol cockpunch
-
jonathaneunice liked this
-
a-interest reblogged this from marco and added:
Yes, that is utter bullshit. I reckon the reason is that their password hash algorithm probably ignores everything after...
-
collectedwisdom liked this
-
redcloud liked this
-
reidgober reblogged this from marco
-
smartasshat liked this
-
steelopus liked this
-
nikf liked this
-
lkm reblogged this from ataferner and added:
O_o Translation from technobullshit to human: “I’m high as...kite.” Seriously. None...
-
nicksummers liked this
-
coyotesqrl liked this
-
berezina liked this
-
guillee liked this
-
jerryyeti liked this
-
toldorknown reblogged this from marco and added:
It’s a crock. As I’m sure you know, encrypted characters are all equally easy to decrypt, which is to say virtually...
-
tristn liked this
-
cwj liked this
-
david liked this
-
lucas liked this
-
fowkswe reblogged this from marco and added:
Always wondered this myself. It seems...a weak security measure for a major financial...
-
strake liked this
-
warszawaaa liked this
-
marco reblogged this from iamdanw
-
zerolab reblogged this from ataferner
-
iamdanw reblogged this from ataferner
-
travs liked this
-
janhapke reblogged this from ataferner
-
stammy reblogged this from ataferner and added:
FAILLLLLLLLLLLLL
-
enlavin reblogged this from ataferner
-
scott-jackson liked this
-
makenosound liked this
-
icepack liked this
-
jessta reblogged this from ataferner and added:
easily enough, alphanumeric, that’s 32^8 = 1099511627776 You can’t brute force that without getting noticed. But still...
- Show more notes